Given my obsession with having high schoolers learn cooking by making their own cooking shows ("as seen on TV"), it's not surprising that the next question is "what kitchen?".
Are urban high schools set up to let the students operate the cafeteria? Of course not. Paid pros do the kitchen work, considered extracurricular from the designers' standpoint.
However, per Project Earthala, and drawing from my experience with (a) gatherings of young Friends and (b) Food not Bombs, I'm used to the idea that the kitchen is center stage, where the action is, the logistics on both ends, time-wise, meaning trucking the food to the prep site and then, serving the food. The final stage is likewise critical: clearn-up. The kitchen should be made spic-n-span for the next scheduled event.
However, per Project Earthala, and drawing from my experience with (a) gatherings of young Friends and (b) Food not Bombs, I'm used to the idea that the kitchen is center stage, where the action is, the logistics on both ends, time-wise, meaning trucking the food to the prep site and then, serving the food. The final stage is likewise critical: clearn-up. The kitchen should be made spic-n-span for the next scheduled event.
So in this cooking show we may be showing off new kinds of appliances, along with workflows and recipes that seem exotic and esoteric to the viewing audience. Each campus village is its own subculture of partially overlapping subcultures.
If you're one of the teachers, maybe on the fooding side, maybe on the video production side, you'll be looked to to provide context. The "kitchen debate" is an event in history to hearken back to because (a) it's about competition in livingry (not killingry) and (b) because of the Moscow dome.
If you're one of the teachers, maybe on the fooding side, maybe on the video production side, you'll be looked to to provide context. The "kitchen debate" is an event in history to hearken back to because (a) it's about competition in livingry (not killingry) and (b) because of the Moscow dome.
